What's this blog about?

I teach several courses under the broad topic of "Multicultural Education," prioritizing social justice issues of access, power/privilege, & narrowing the academic achievement gap. I am a person of color and I almost always have a white co-teacher. We include topics, such as: racism, sexism, heterosexism, ableism, ethnocentrism, deculturalization, transforming curriculum, etc. This is a place where I post information that we teach; lesson plans for activities; and resources we use and/or which are shared with me by my adult students.
Showing posts with label Internalized Oppression. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Internalized Oppression. Show all posts

Friday, August 14, 2015

Definition Cycle to Show Relationships Between Prejudice, Stereotypes, and Discrimination

  1. Have kids go around to chart paper and write the assumptions they know (or have heard) about for different groups.
  2. Write the word “stereotype” on the board to the right/East. You are going to move in a clockwise direction like moving around on the points of a compass/digital clock. 
  3. Ask students what they think “stereotype” means (remind them that they just wrote out assumptions on the chart paper - so what is a "stereotype").  Write down a few reasonable responses (single story, overgeneralizations based on misinformation) that you know do not fall into one of the other categories (prejudice, discrimination, -ism) and make sure you emphasize that “stereotypes” are “assumptions” about individuals and/or groups of people and “in your head,” but then people act upon them which puts them into another category that we are going to talk about. 
  4. Write the word “prejudice” on the board in the South, connecting to previous word with an arrow. 
  5. Ask students what they think “prejudice” means. Write down a few reasonable responses (making decisions before you know all the facts, jumping to conclusion) that you know do not fall into one of the other categories (stereotype, discrimination, -ism) and make sure you emphasize that a “prejudice” has “judgment” added to an assumption/stereotype. The judgment can be “good” or “bad” but is usually “bad” because it puts down a group, ranks them lower/less than, etc. Again, these are “in your head,” but then people act upon them, which puts them into another category that we are going to talk about. 
  6. Write the word “discrimination” on the board in the West, connecting to previous word with an arrow. 
  7. Ask students what they think “discrimination” means. Write down a few reasonable responses (being mean, making decisions to include/exclude, even “bullying” could fit here) that you know do not fall into one of the other categories (stereotype, prejudice, -ism) and make sure you emphasize that a “discrimination” has an action attached to it. We can now see the behaviors/actions that someone has based on the stereotypes and prejudices they have in their mind. Up to this point, any/every individual can be part of this cycle that we are creating - stereotyping, acting in a prejudicial way, and discriminating against someone. How can this be? 
  8. Write “-ism” on the board in the North, connecting to previous word with an arrow. 
  9. Tell students that -ism (like racism, sexism, ageism, heterosexism, etc.) keep the cycle going and that makes them bigger than an individual person’s idea only in their own head - Where do -isms come from? Who has the power to pass on a stereotypes and prejudices? What INSTITUTIONS would that be? Try to get the students to come up with institutional/systemic places (like places of worship, schools, novels, magazines, news, television, media, textbooks, etc.). 
  10. Then draw a bulls-eye with “PERSONAL” in the middle, “SOCIETAL” in the next circle around that, and “INSTITUTIONAL” in the outer most circle. “Personal” is those individual acts of meanness we are all capable of. “Societal” means the social norms and cultural practices of the society around you. “Institutional” is the institutions that have the power to perpetuate the stereotypes, which lead to prejudice, and discrimination by individuals. It’s the “smog” around us. We can’t help but “breathe” it in because there are so many places we see it. In order to reach the -ism category all three of the things in this bulls-eye are working as a “system” to perpetuate misinformation and the cycle. 
  11. This circle (stereotype to prejudice, to discrimination to -ism) is also known of the “Cycle of Oppression” because it can keeps stereotypes going. 
  12. What do you think it is called when you get “off” the “Cycle”? Draw out answers like active bystander, ally, activist, and change agent. 
  13. How would you get off the “Cycle”? Draw out answers like standing up for others, educating others, educating yourself, paying attention to when other people say it’s a stereotype/problem, etc.
This is what it looks like when I create it on a chart as I talk it through.

This is it cleaned up.


Here is the first part, (#1) "getting out" stereotypes/assumptions kids have about others.

Thursday, August 13, 2015

Taking out the Trash

For the past couple of years, we have been doing this activity in our school where we "take out the trash."

Bristal, P. et al, “Treating Thoughts as material Objects Can Increase or Decrease Their Impact on Evaluations” Psychological Science

In Western dualistic culture, it is assumed that thoughts cannot be treated as material objects; however, language is replete with metaphorical analogies suggesting otherwise. In the research reported here, we examined whether objectifying thoughts can influence whether the thoughts are used in subsequent evaluations. In Experiment 1, participants wrote about what they either liked or disliked about their bodies. Then, the paper on which they wrote their thoughts was either ripped up and tossed in the trash or kept and checked for errors. When participants physically discarded a representation of their thoughts, they mentally discarded them as well, using them less in forming judgments than did participants who retained a representation of their thoughts. Experiment 2 replicated this finding and also showed that people relied on their thoughts more when they physically kept them in a safe place—putting their thoughts in their pockets—than when they discarded them. A final study revealed that these effects were stronger when the action was performed physically rather than merely imagined.

Monday, January 30, 2012

Internalized Racism

How does skin color play itself out within the African American community?  Here is a good video to follow up either "Girl Like Me" or the Clark experiment with white and black dolls.



Monday, July 11, 2011

Eyelid Surgery

Asian  women having surgery on their eyes.

A Girl Like Me

This video recreates the Clark & Clark study which asks Black children to choose between a Black and a White baby doll (in the original study, they chose the White doll more often).  It moves to present day internalized oppression experienced by African American/Black heritage young women.  This version has a follow up video with the director afterwards.